HRC35 | Demand adherence to legal obligations and Council membership standards
If the Human Rights Council is to be the legitimate, influential body that the global human rights situation demands, then States must demand adherence to international standards and legal obligations by HRC members and candidates, ISHR tells the 35th session of the Council in Geneva.
In a statement responding to the UN High Commissioner’s call for greater cooperation with the Council, and his denunciation of States that fail to do so as ‘betraying their people‘, ISHR Director Phil Lynch outlined four key commitments to which all Council members should commit and be held to account.
Article 56 of the UN Charter imposes a general legal obligation on all States to cooperate with the UN, including the Human Rights Council and its Special Procedures, to promote and protect human rights.
As the High Commissioner remarked, pursuant to paragraph 9 of GA Resolution 60/251, members and candidates for the Council also undertake to uphold the highest human rights standards and to cooperate fully with the Council. Paragraph 8 sets out that Members that commit gross and systematic violations should be suspended.
Mr President, we join the High Commissioner in calling on States to cooperate substantively and in good faith with this Council and in compliance with their treaty obligations.
Evidence of gross and systematic violations in Burundi, possibly amounting to crimes against humanity, together with that State’s flagrant refusal to cooperate with a Council-mandated commission and its perpetration of reprisals against civil society actors who seek to cooperate with the UN, is not compatible with Council membership.
Egypt’s repressive new NGO law breaches the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), will contribute to instability and insecurity, and is not the act of a State complying with standards of Council membership.
If this Council is to be the legitimate, influential body that the global human rights situation demands, then we must in turn demand adherence to international standards and legal obligations by its members and candidates.
In this regard, ISHR calls on all members and candidates to publicly pledge to:
Cooperate fully, substantively and in good faith with the Council and all of its mechanisms and processes;
Ensure a safe, enabling environment for civil society and consult meaningfully with civil society on positions taken by the State in this Council;
Desist from, prevent, investigate and remedy all acts of intimidation and reprisal; and
Commit to and apply objective criteria – such as those elaborated in the joint statement delivered by Ireland at HRC 32 – in determining whether and how the Council should respond to a situation of concern, and take leadership and responsibility in initiating action when such criteria are met.
We further call on all UN Member States to consider these factors when electing Council members at the General Assembly later this year.
The legitimacy, effectiveness and future of the Council depends on it.
On 17 October 2025, ahead of the 85th ordinary session of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, civil society organisations expressed their concerns about the continual shrinking of civic space.
Sharing the documentation of the situation of human rights on the continent, the NGO Forum of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights gave, on 17 October 2025, the opportunity to sub-regional focal points to provide a brief description of the situation of HRDs in Africa.
Relatives of the Chilean Indigenous environmental defender Julia Chuñil must be granted immediate protections by the Chilean State, the Committee to Support Implementation and Compliance of the Escazú Agreement ruled, in response to a request supported by ISHR. This marks the first time the regional treaty urges a signatory State to take protective action.