News

17 Oct

The freedom to share our views without fear of punishment is crucial to the safety, development and prosperity of any society. States should call on Saudi Arabia to immediately release all detained defenders and reform its legislative framework to ensure that civil society can carry out their work without any hindrance. 

16 Oct

Burundi’s protracted efforts to prevent a UN body mandated to monitor the human rights situation in the country from reporting, were thwarted today by a vote in the General Assembly’s human rights committee.

15 Oct

Everyone should be able to express their opinion freely without any prosecution. China’s upcoming Universal Periodic Review is a key opportunity for all States to call on China to ensure a safe and enabling environment for defenders and to uphold its human rights obligations.  

12 Oct

Earlier today the General Assembly elected 18 new members to the Human Rights Council, the UN’s top human rights body, for the 2019-2021 term. Not only were countries that blatantly violate the required criteria among those elected, they received a substantial number of votes. 

24 Sep

The world’s top human rights body should only be composed of States who have a genuine commitment to protecting human rights. At the Human Rights Council elections to take place tomorrow in New York, UN Member States should refrain from voting for candidates that blatantly fail to uphold the highest standards of human rights and fail to fully cooperate with this Council.

Previous Editions of the Human Rights Monitor

18.02.2008
 
On this page you can find the Human Rights Monitor editions for 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

Please note that prior editions of the Human Rights Monitor are not available online but you may contact  information@ishr.ch to find out how to obtain hard copies from the 2004 edition backwards.

Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)

18.02.2008
 

Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Reports

18.02.2008
 

In this section you will find:

Further information on the UPR

  • More information on what the UPR is, how it works, and how NGOs can engage is available on this website's UPR page
  • Also check UPR-Info - the first website entirely dedicated to the UPR process providing detailed explanations of the mechanism, reports from States, NGOs and the OHCHR, summaries of every country's review, and final outcomes and recommendations
  • UPR-Info has recently developed an Issues Analysis in the form of tables that show what issue was raised by which State, and on what State under review

To receive ISHR's UPR Monitor reports by e-mail

Please write to us at information@ishr.ch with 'UPR Monitor' in the subject line, and you will start receiving our reports shortly after each session, free of charge.

UPR Analytical Overviews

10.09.2008
 

This page displays the analytical overviews ISHR has put together regarding the UPR sessions so far:

  • Analytical overview of the UPR in 2008 (1st - 3rd sessions and Council adoption) 
  • Analytical overview of the UPR, April-June 2008 (1st and 2nd sessions)

  • Analytical overview of the 1st session, 7-18 April 2008 

Individual reports on the review of countries at the UPR's sessions can be found under browse by country or browse by session.

More information on what the UPR is, how it works, and how NGOs can engage is available on this our UPR page.

UPR - Browse by Session

06.03.2008
 

Scroll down to see all sessions. You can also browse our reports on a specific country.

* indicates that the report is not a full report, but a snapshot of the main issues raised in the Working Group.

 

UPR - Browse by Country

06.03.2008
 

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z

* indicates that the report is provisional pending the aqdoption of report by the Working Group.

 


A

Afghanistan 5th session
Albania 6th session
Algeria 1st session
Angola 7th session
Argentina 1st session
Armenia 8th session
> top

B

Bahamas 3rd session
Bahrain 1st session
Barbados 3rd session*
Belarus 8th session
Belize 5th session*
Benin 2nd session, 2ème session (en français)
Bhutan 6th session
Bolivia 7th session
Bosnia 7th session
Botswana 3rd session
Brazil 1st session
Brunei Darussalam 6th session
Burkina Faso 3rd session
Burundi 3rd session*
> top

C

Cambodia 6th session
Canada 4th session
Cape Verde 3rd session
Central African Republic 5th session
Chad  5th session
Chile 5th session
China 4th session, Chinese version: 中国
Colombia 3rd session
Comoros 5th session
Congo 5th session *, 6th session
Costa Rica 6th session
Côte d'Ivoire 6th session
Cuba 4th session
Cyprus 6th session
Czech Republic 1st session
> top

D

Democratic Peoples' Republic of Korea 6th session
Democratic Republic of the Congo 6th session

Dominica

6th session
Dominican Republic 6th session
> top

E

Ecuador 1st session
Egypt 7th session
El Salvador 7th session
Equatorial Guinea 6th session
Eritrea 6th session
Ethiopia 6th session
> top

F

Fiji 7th session
Finland 1st session
France 2ème session (rapport en français)
> top

G

Gabon 2nd session
Gambia 7th session
Germany 4th session
Ghana 2nd session
Grenada 8th session
Guatemala 2nd session
Guinea 8th session
Guinea-Bissau 8th session
Guyana 8th session
> top

H

Haiti 8th session
 
> top

I

India

1st session

Indonesia

1st session

Iraq 7th session
Iran 7th session

Israel

3rd session

Italy 7th session
 
> top

J

Japan 2nd session
Jordan 4th session **
> top

K

Kazakhstan

7th session
Kenya 8th session
Kiribati 8th session
Kuwait 8th session
Kyrgyzstan 8th session
 
 top

L

Lao People's Democratic Republic 8th session
Lesotho 8th session

Liechtenstein

3rd session

Luxembourg

3rd session
 
> top

M

Madagascar 7th session
Mali 2nd session (not available yet)
Malta 5th session
Malaysia 4th session **
Mauritius 4th session **
Mexico 4th session
Monaco 5th session
Montenegro 3rd session
Morocco 1st session
> top

N

Netherlands 1st session
New Zealand 5th session
Nicaragua 7th session
Nigeria 4th session
Norway 6th session
> top

O

No reports under O.

> top

P

Pakistan 2nd session
Peru 2nd session
Philippines 1st session
Poland 1st session
Portugal 6th session
> top

Q

Qatar

7th session

> top

R

Republic of Korea 2nd session, 6th session
Romania 2nd session
Russian Federation 4th session, Russian version: Российская Федерация
> top

S

San Marino 7th session
Saudi Arabia 4th session
Serbia 3rd session
Slovakia 5th session
Slovenia 7th session
South Africa 2nd session
Spain 8th session
Sri Lanka 2nd session
Switzerland 2nd session
Sweden 8th session
> top

T

Tonga 2nd session
Tunisia 1st session
Turkey 8th session
Turkmenistan 3rd session
Tuvalu 3rd session
> top

U

Ukraine 2nd session
United Arab Emirates 3rd session
United Kingdom 1st session
Uruguay 5th session
Uzbekistan 3rd session
> top

V

Vanuatu 5th session
Viet Nam 5th session
> top

W

No reports under W.

> top

X

No reports under X.

> top

Y

Yemen 5th session
> top

Z

Zambia 2nd session
> top

Council Monitor

06.12.2007
 

The Council Monitor is an ISHR publication reporting on all the key developments at the Human Rights Council (the Council) and its mechanisms. It consists of the following reports:

 

  • The Council Alerts are sent out and published a few weeks before the beginning of each session of the Council and provide a summary of the important issues to be discussed at the upcoming session
  • The Daily Updates are published each day during Council sessions and review what happened inside and outside the plenary. At the 10th session of the Council they were replaced by the Council Updates
  • The Session Overviews are published a few weeks after each session and provide an analytical perspective
  • Reports on the meetings of the Durban Review Conference and the Advisory Committee
  • Special procedures reports: Up until the 7th session of the Council, we produced the Reports in Short, unofficial summaries of all the reports submitted to the Human Rights Council by special procedures
  • During the institution-building phase of the Council, we produced reports on the Working Groups of the Council

To receive all the key Council Monitor reports by e-mail

Please go to our subscriptions page and sign up to receive your choice of ISHR publications by e-mail, free of charge.

Copyright, distribution and use of Council Monitor reports

Material from this publication may be reproduced for training, teaching or other non-commercial purposes as long as ISHR is fully acknowledged. You can also distribute this publication and link to it from your website as long as ISHR is fully acknowledged as the source. No part of this publication may be reproduced for any commercial purpose without the prior express permission of the copyright holders. ISHR accepts no responsibility for any inaccuracies arising from or connected to unapproved or unofficial translations of its publications or parts thereof.

Publications on the Institution-Building of the Human Rights Council

18.02.2008
 

This page combines ISHR Publications on the institution-building process of the Human Rights Council. Throughout the institution-building process, we monitored and reported on its various aspects. Most of the publications on this page are by now superseded by more analytical pieces, but they are of continued relevance as they shed light on the context in which the Council conducts its daily business. For an overview of the institution-building process, please go to the section on the Human Rights Council, in particular the page on the institution-building process. 

Adoption of the institution-building text

Final stages of the institution-building process

Towards the end of the first cycle (spring 2007), the completion of the institution-building process was taken up by the President through a process of public informal consultations (on 10, 18 and 24 May 2007) and private discussions. The aim was to reach consensus towards adoption a 'institution-building package' on 18 June at the fifth session of the Human Rights Council. See our brief update reports on that phase: 

Reports about the Working Groups

The bulk of the debates around the various aspects of the institution-building process took place in three different working groups. Using the navigation on the left, you can access detailed reports on each of these working groups. On each page, you will find:

  • Overviews of all of the Working Groups' meetings since November 2006

  • Daily Highlights for the last meetings of the Working Groups from 10-27 April 2007

  • Highlights of the President's Informal Consultations on the Institution-Building Process taking place between 10 May and the 5th session of the Council

Please select a Working Group in the navigation bar on the left to view all the reports that we have produced on that specific Working Group's discussions and meetings.

The Institution-Building Process

21.11.2007
 

Background

When the Human Rights Council (the Council) was established on 19 June 2006, it faced a heavy programme of work for its first year. It was to review, rationalise and improve on the former Commission on Human Rights’ (the Commission) system of special procedures, expert advice and complaint procedure, set up a new universal periodic review (UPR) mechanism, and develop its own agenda, programme of work, and rules of procedure. These tasks were to be completed by 18 June 2007, when the membership of the Council would also change. Because the discussions on these issues would shape the workings of the Council for the years to come, the process was generally called 'institution-building'. It dominated the Council's agenda in the first year, and accordingly became the focus of many national and international NGOs.

Formally, the institution-building process was concluded with the adoption of Resolution 5/1 at midnight on 18 June 2007. However, despite the many hours spent on institution building during the first year, the final ‘institution-building package’  did not settle all of the Council’s institutional questions. It required the Council to still discuss and decide on a number of important issues that were not resolved in the institution-building text. Accordingly, many institution-building tasks continued to be discussed throughout the Council's second cycle.

The institution-building working groups

The Council set up three working groups to tackle the different issues confronting it as an institution. It set up working groups on the review of mechanisms and mandates, on the elaboration of modalities for the UPR, and later in the year on the elaboration of an agenda, programme of work, rules of procedure and methods of work. 

The inter-governmental Working Group to ‘formulate concrete recommendations on the issue of reviewing and, where necessary, improving and rationalizing all mandates, mechanisms, functions and responsibilities in order to maintain a system of special procedures, expert advice and a complaint procedure divided its work into three segments: the review of special procedures; the complaint procedure; and the expert advice body, each facilitated by a Permanent Representative to the UN in Geneva.‘ 

The institution-building Working Groups held their final sessions from 10 to 26 April 2007. The finalisation of their work was marked by a handover to the President of the Council of the final non-papers by the respective facilitators. During the weeks leading up to the 'deadline' of 18 June 2007, the then President of the Council, Mexican Ambassador Luis Alfonso de Alba, led the last minute negotiations himself. He held a series of  public informal consultations (on 10, 18, 24 and possibly 25 May 2007) and private discussions, with a view to finding consensus on the important institutional framework of the Council. The year-long process culminated in the adoption of the 'institution-building text' or Resolution 5/1

Implementation of the institution-building text

Starting at its 6th session, the Council started to fill in the missing pieces in its institutional framework. Technical requirements for the selection of special procedures mandate holders and members of the Advisory Committee had to be agreed on, and the modalities of the new UPR had to be refined. Throughout its second cycle, the Council has 'fine-tuned' its machinery, and at the start of the third cycle seems to be ready to fully devote itself to substantive human rights issues.

> top

Further reading

ISHR has closely followed the institution-building process and has produced comprehensive reports on each of the working groups' discussions. These are available in the Publications section.

Several authors have analysed and commented upon the institution-building at various stages:

Reports on the special procedures

03.09.2008
 

This section provides different types of reports on the Human Rights Council's (and former Commission on Human Rights') special procedures mandate holders' interaction with eachother and with the Council or Commission:

Pages

Browse our articles:

Region

Country

Topic

Mechanism

1984

ISHR commences work to develop an international Declaration on the Rights of Human Rights Defenders

1988

ISHR publishes first Human Rights Monitor, connecting human rights defenders on the ground with international human rights systems and developments

1993

ISHR facilitates global civil society engagement with the Second World Conference on Human Rights, which leads to the strengthening of women’s rights, the affirmation of universal rights, the adoption of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action and the establishment of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

1994

ISHR provides training, technical assistance and support to its 1000th human rights defender

1998

After 14 years of ISHR lobbying, advocacy and negotiation, the UN General Assembly adopts the landmark Declaration on Human Rights Defenders

2000

UN Secretary-General appoints Hina Jilani as inaugural UN Special Representative on Human Rights Defenders, strengthening protection of human rights advocates at risk worldwide.

2004

ISHR leads a successful campaign for the appointment of a Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights

2005

ISHR co-founds and supports a range of international and regional human rights coalitions, including the Women Human Rights Defenders International Coalition, the East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project and the West African Human Rights Defenders Network

2006

ISHR contributes to the establishment and institution building of a new global peak body for human rights issues, the UN Human Rights Council

2007

ISHR leads and coordinates the development of the Yogyakarta Principles on sexual orientation and gender identity, strengthening legal recognition and protection of LGBT rights worldwide

2011

ISHR’s sustained advocacy on the issue of reprisals and intimidation faced by human rights defenders leads to adoption of landmark UN Human Rights Council resolution condemning and strengthening protections against reprisals

2012

Working with key NGO partners such as Amnesty International, ISHR leads civil society efforts to strengthen UN human rights treaty bodies, prevent their weakening and better connect their work with victims and human rights defenders on the ground

2013

Working with supportive states and NGOs, ISHR advocacy leads to adoption of historic Human Rights Council resolution calling on all States to review and amend national laws to respect and protect the work of human rights defenders