08 Feb

The UN Committee on NGOs has recommended withdrawal of ECOSOC accreditation to three Turkish NGOs which were controversially deregistered in the country last year. In a letter to the UN Secretary General, Member States and the President of ECOSOC, a group of national, regional and international NGOs are urging ECOSOC to reject the Committee’s recommendations, expressing deep concern for a lack of due process and insisting on the urgent need for reform.  

16 Feb
Courtesy of @badiucao

A sustained crackdown deserves a sustained response, said global NGOs today. In a joint letter, they call on Member and Observer States of the UN Human Rights Council to speak out about the ongoing violations against human rights defenders in the country and to hold the Government of China - recently re-elected to the Council - accountable for its failures to respect human rights.

15 Feb

Human rights defenders play a critical role in supporting accountability for human rights violations involving businesses. Yet, in doing so, they face serious restrictions and risks. Governments should see the protection of human rights defenders as an element of their work to hold companies accountable for abuses, writes ISHR’s Sarah M Brooks.

10 Feb

Governments should take urgent collective action at the forthcoming March session of the UN Human Rights Council to address a 'marked deterioration in the already poor human rights situation in Bahrain', a group of 16 leading NGOs said in an open letter to Ambassadors released today.

02 Feb

Business should heed the views of human rights defenders, and do more to protect their crucial work—which advances the rule of law that benefits business too, says Sarah Brooks of International Service for Human Rights. Sarah leads ISHR's work in Asia, and also supports defenders seeking to advance corporate accountability.


NAP Guide German

Finance Manager Advert

ISHR submission to CERD

Attempt to stop debate on country situations rejected by UN committee

(New York) In an unprecedented step at a session of the UN General Assembly's Third Committee - which is tasked with considering social, humanitarian and cultural matters, Belarus introduced a no-action motion on an entire agenda item – relating to country situations on Iran, DPRK (North Korea), Syria and Crimea – in a move to stop discussion and action on these resolutions.  This attempt was roundly rejected and the Committee went on to adopt resolutions on all these country situations.

‘The Third Committee has reasserted the value of debate on country situations by rejecting this no-action motion, and by adopting a new country resolution on the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol,’ said ISHR’s Madeleine Sinclair. 

Introducing the no-action motion, Belarus argued that country resolutions were ‘an arbitrary instrument of coercion’ and a ‘haughty voice of reprimand and intimidation’.  Furthermore, country resolutions were useless if the country in question wasn’t on board. The Belarus Ambassador noted that either the world was in ‘utter denial’ of the counterproductivity of country resolutions, or simply didn’t care.  Other States supported Belarus noting that they were in favour of ‘cooperation and dialogue’ which they claimed only the Universal Periodic Review ensured.

These positions were strongly rejected by other States, including Saudi Arabia who noted that the no-action motion deprived Member States of the ‘important opportunity’ to decide the merits of an individual resolution.  To remove all four resolutions under discussion, which had collected over 160 sponsors, would be an ‘unconscionable decision’, the Ambassador noted.

Days earlier NGOs had expressed concern at the use of the no-action motion noting that, if successful, it would signal that the UN was not a place where freedom of expression is respected, nor open debate encouraged. 

With the no-action motion rejected (101 to 32, with 37 abstentions) the Third Committee considered country resolutions.  On the resolution on their own country Iran noted that ‘our imperfection is no greater than any other country’ and didn’t merit a country resolution.  Both Brazil and Mexico abstained noting that they felt that a focus on technical assistance in the resolution would have been more helpful.

In regard to the resolution on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the DPRK described the resolution an ‘illegal document’ on which they saw no need to call a vote.  They did not consider there to be consensus on the text and called on all States to disassociate themselves from it.  No vote was called so the resolution was adopted by consensus.  

All other resolutions – on Crimea, Iran and Syria  were put to a vote and adopted.  The adoption of the new resolution on Crimea was met with elation by supporters in the room. 

Vote records on country resolutions:

  • Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol: 73 – 23 (76 abstentions)

  • DPRK: consensus

  • Iran: 85 – 35 (63 abstentions)

  • Syria:  116 – 15 (49 abstentions) 

Article year: 



Article disponible en français ici

The International Criminal Court is needed to ensure justice for victims and to send a clear warning to future would-be tyrants that they will be held accountable, writes ISHR’s Clément Voule.

Browse our articles:






ISHR commences work to develop an international Declaration on the Rights of Human Rights Defenders


ISHR publishes first Human Rights Monitor, connecting human rights defenders on the ground with international human rights systems and developments


ISHR facilitates global civil society engagement with the Second World Conference on Human Rights, which leads to the strengthening of women’s rights, the affirmation of universal rights, the adoption of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action and the establishment of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights


ISHR provides training, technical assistance and support to its 1000th human rights defender


After 14 years of ISHR lobbying, advocacy and negotiation, the UN General Assembly adopts the landmark Declaration on Human Rights Defenders


UN Secretary-General appoints Hina Jilani as inaugural UN Special Representative on Human Rights Defenders, strengthening protection of human rights advocates at risk worldwide.


ISHR leads a successful campaign for the appointment of a Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders by the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights


ISHR co-founds and supports a range of international and regional human rights coalitions, including the Women Human Rights Defenders International Coalition, the East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Project and the West African Human Rights Defenders Network


ISHR contributes to the establishment and institution building of a new global peak body for human rights issues, the UN Human Rights Council


ISHR leads and coordinates the development of the Yogyakarta Principles on sexual orientation and gender identity, strengthening legal recognition and protection of LGBT rights worldwide


ISHR’s sustained advocacy on the issue of reprisals and intimidation faced by human rights defenders leads to adoption of landmark UN Human Rights Council resolution condemning and strengthening protections against reprisals


Working with key NGO partners such as Amnesty International, ISHR leads civil society efforts to strengthen UN human rights treaty bodies, prevent their weakening and better connect their work with victims and human rights defenders on the ground


Working with supportive states and NGOs, ISHR advocacy leads to adoption of historic Human Rights Council resolution calling on all States to review and amend national laws to respect and protect the work of human rights defenders